Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The Journal Ars Veterinaria aims to publish original and unpublished research articles, case reports and reviews, which contribute to the development of the Veterinary and Animal Sciences.

 

Section Policies

Surgery

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Small Animals surgery

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Large Animals Clinic

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Small Animals Clinic

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Physiology and Pharmacology

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Inspection and Technology of Foods of Animal Origin/Inspeção e Tecnologia de Alimentos de Origem Animal

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Preventive Veterinary Medicine/Medicina Veterinária Preventiva

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Animal Breeding/Melhoramento Genético Animal

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Microbiology/Microbiologia

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Morphology/Morfologia

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Obstetrics/Obstetrícia Animal

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Parasitology/Parasitologia

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Pathology/Patologia

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Animal Production (Monogastrics)/Produção Animal (Monogástricos)

Editors
  • Fernando Almeida
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Animal Production (Ruminants)/Produção Animal (Ruminantes)

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Animal Reproduction/Reprodução Animal

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

I SIMPREV (Abstract)

NORMAS PARA ENVIO DE TRABALHOS CIENTÍFICOS

A submissão de artigos está condicionada à inscrição de pelo menos um dos autores, até a data limite estabelecida: 02 de junho a 02 de agosto 2013.

· NORMAS GERAIS

Todos os itens destas normas serão rigorosamente considerados pela comissão científica para
aceite, avaliação e apresentação dos trabalhos que serão submetidos ao simpósio.

· NORMAS PARA ENVIO DOS RESUMOS

1. Cada participante, com sua inscrição devidamente paga, terá direito ao envio de, no máximo, dois trabalhos.
2. Os anais serão publicados como suplemento especial da revista científica Ars Veterinaria, editada na Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Câmpus de Jaboticabal, dependendo do número total de trabalhos aprovados pelo simpósio.
3. Os trabalhos poderão ser redigidos em português ou inglês apresentados na forma de RESUMO SIMPLES.
4. Deverão ser originais, oriundos de observações técnico-científicas, trabalhos de extensão (com detalhamento dos resultados obtidos), estudos prospectivos e retrospectivos e relatos de casos com valor para a comunidade científica nas diversas áreas temáticas classificadas. Não serão aceitas revisões de literatura.
5. Os trabalhos não podem ter sido apresentados em outros eventos ou terem sido submetidos a periódicos.
6. As áreas temáticas para submissão de trabalhos ao I Simpósio Internacional de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva: “Novas Tecnologias e Novos Desafios” são:
6.1. Doenças Infecciosas
6.2. Doenças Parasitárias
6.3. Epidemiologia
6.4. Higiene e Inspeção de Produtos de Origem Animal
6.5. Saúde Pública
6.6. Zoonoses
6.7. Vigilância Ambiental
6.8. Vigilância Sanitária
6.9. Planejamento em Saúde Animal e Saúde Pública Veterinária
7. Somente serão aceitos trabalhos relativos aos eixos especificados acima.
8. O texto deve ser digitado em documento Word (arquivo.doc), espaço 1,5, justificado, fonte Times New Roman, tamanho 12. (Deverão ser mantidas margens de 2,5cm à esquerda, direita, superior e inferior). Os parágrafos devem iniciar a 1,0 cm da
margem esquerda. O corpo do texto deve ter no máximo 300 palavras.
9. O título do trabalho deverá ser apresentado em português, em negrito, letras maiúsculas e centralizado. Após o título em português, deve ser informado o título em inglês, que deverá ser centralizado, entre parênteses, em letras maiúsculas e em itálico.
10. Será permitido um número máximo de seis autores. Devem-se utilizar letras maiúsculas, iniciando-se com as iniciais seguidas de ponto e espaço e, a seguir, o sobrenome (Ex.: J. A. COSTA).
11. Os nomes dos autores deverão ser separados por vírgula, centralizados e em negrito, devem vir logo abaixo do título do trabalho.
12. A titulação e a instituição dos autores devem vir no rodapé informando o endereço eletrônico somente do autor para correspondência, que deverá ser identificado, entre os autores, por um asterisco, após o número de identificação do autor.
13. As citações de autores no texto (quando entre parênteses) deverão ser em letras maiúsculas, seguidas do ano de publicação (Ex.: SMITH, 2000). Quando houver dois autores, usar “&” (Ex.: SMITH & JONES, 2000). No caso de três ou mais autores, citar apenas o primeiro, seguido de et al (SMITH et al., 2000). Quando autores forem citados "fora de parênteses", apenas a primeira letra de cada nome deve ser maiúscula Ex.: Smith & Jones, 2000.
14. Os trabalhos serão submetidos exclusivamente através da home page da Revista Ars Veterinaria (http://www.arsveterinaria.org.br) na sessão I Simpósio Internacional de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva. Os trabalhos enviados estarão isentos da taxa de tramitação exigida pela revista.
15. Todos os trabalhos em desacordo com as normas supracitadas serão automaticamente devolvidos. Em caso de tempo hábil, poderá haver reapresentação para posterior encaminhamento para avaliação da comissão científica. Os resumos que estiverem em acordo com as normas serão enviados para a comissão cientifica do evento, composta por relatores nas diferentes especialidades do tema do simpósio.
16. Os trabalhos serão julgados por corpo de relatores convidado pela comissão científica do I Simpósio Internacional de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva: “Novas Tecnologias e Novos Desafios”. O corpo de relatores pode aceitar ou recusar os trabalhos, não
cabendo revisões do trabalho ou do julgamento.
17. Os casos omissos a estas normas serão submetidos ao Comitê Científico e por ele decididos.
18. As dúvidas sobre quaisquer procedimentos referentes aos resumos encaminhados para este simpósio poderão ser sanadas pelo email: trabalhosimposioprev@gmail.com ou tel: (16) 8150-7911.

OBSERVAÇÕES:
· Após concluída a submissão do trabalho científico, não será possível a alteração de nenhuma informação. Portanto, atenção ao submeter seu trabalho!

APRESENTAÇÃO DE TRABALHOS
1. Forma de apresentação: PÔSTER.
2. Estará sob responsabilidade dos apresentadores a elaboração dos pôsteres, sua fixação e seu recolhimento no dia da apresentação que estará disponível no site do evento.
3. O pôster deverá ser elaborado na forma de um painel, medindo 0,90m de largura por 1,00m de altura. Deverá conter, com as limitações de praxe, e de forma clara e sintética. Deverá conter, ainda, endereço para contato com os autores.
4. Após o aceite do(s) trabalho(s), ficará disponível, via página oficial do simpósio na internet, o dia e o horário de exposição do(s) mesmo(s).
5. Cada trabalho científico apresentado receberá um certificado, no qual constarão os nomes de todos os autores especificados no resumo; o preenchimento incorreto é de inteira responsabilidade dos autores, portanto não será fornecido novo certificado. Para o recebimento do certificado relativo ao trabalho será obrigatória a exposição do pôster pelo autor apresentador. NÃO SERÃO ENTREGUES CERTIFICADOS A TRABALHOS CUJO APRESENTADOR NÃO COMPARECEU AO EVENTO.

Renata Ferreira dos Santos
Comissão Científica
e-mail: renatafdsantos@hotmail.com
tel: (16)8150-7911

Prof. Dr. Estevam Guilherme Lux Hoppe
Diretor Científico
e- mail: e.hoppe@gmail.com
telefone: (16) 3209 2646 ramal (215)

Prof. Dra. Adolorata A. Bianco Carvalho
Coordenadora Geral
e-mail: adbianco@fcav.unesp.br
telefone: (16) 3209 2646 ramal (213)

Editors
  • Estevam Guilherme Hoppe
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

( I SIMPREV )

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

( I SIMPREV )

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

( I SIMPREV )

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

( I SIMPREV )

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

( I SIMPREV )

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

( I SIMPREV )

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

( I SIMPREV )

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

( I SIMPREV )

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

( I SIMPREV )

Editors
  • Adriane Ramon - Veterinária
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

XI Congresso Brasileiro de Anestesiologia Veterinária

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

II SIMPREV

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Animal Production (Monogastrics)/Produção Animal (Monogástricos)-2

Editors
  • Adriane Ramon - Veterinária
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Interdisciplinar

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Large Animal Surgery (Letter to Editor)

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Large Animal Surgery (Short Communication)

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Large Animal Surgery (Research Article)

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Large Animal Surgery (Rewiew Article)

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Large Animal Surgery (Case Report)

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Large Animal Surgery (Abstract)

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Articles sent to Ars Veterinaria are usually reviewed by two specialists of the area. Exceptionally, when there are discrepancies between analyses, the article can be forwarded to a third party evaluator. The Editorial Board is sovereign in their decisions.

 

Publication Frequency

Ars Veterinaria is published quarterly

 

Open Access Policy

This journal offers immediate and free access to its content, following the principle that providing free scientific knowledge to the public provides greater worldwide democratization of the knowledge.

 

Archiving

This Journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create and distribute archiving system among participating libraries and allows you to create permanent archives of the journal for preservation and restoration.

 

Care and Use of Animals

All manuscripts submitted to Ars Veterinaria, involving animal experimentation, must be accom­panied by an statement certifying that the research has followed established standards for the humane care and use of animals. Only investigations that have followed high standards for the humane care and use of animals in research will be reported in Ars Veterinaria.

The manuscript must include a statement of insti­tutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) (or equivalent) approval of all animal procedures. The IACUC statement should appear as the first item in the Materials and Methods. The manuscript should discuss anesthetics, analgesics, tranquilizers, and care taken to minimize pain and discomfort during preop­erative, operative, and postoperative procedures. If re­search requires discomfort to the animals or stressful conditions, justification for these conditions must be evident in papers published in Ars Veterinaria.

 

 

Publication Malpractice

An increasing number of publication malpractice cases have been noticed last years. Problems like plagiarism, authorship disputes and fraudulent research are becoming frequent.

We alert the authors to read about research and publication ethics to avoid misconduct.

The duties of Authors as described by Elsevier’s Home Page (accessed in August 10th, 2012) (http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/authorsview.authors/rights?tab=3) are:

“Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Review and professional publication articles should also be accurate and objective, and editorial ‘opinion’ works should be clearly identified as such.

Data access and retention

Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Plagiarism takes many forms, from ‘passing off’ another’s paper as the author’s own paper, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another’s paper (without attribution), to claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper. Publication of some kinds of articles (e.g. clinical guidelines, translations) in more than one journal is sometimes justifiable, provided certain conditions are met. The authors and editors of the journals concerned must agree to the secondary publication, which must reflect the same data and interpretation of the primary document. The primary reference must be cited in the secondary publication. Further detail on acceptable forms of secondary publication can be found at www.icmje.org.

Acknowledgement of sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Information obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. Information obtained in the course of confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, must not be used without the explicit written permission of the author of the work involved in these services.

Authorship of the paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and human or animal subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript. If the work involves the use of animal or human subjects, the author should ensure that the manuscript contains a statement that all procedures were performed in compliance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines and that the appropriate institutional committee(s) has approved them. Authors should include a statement in the manuscript that informed consent was obtained for experimentation with human subjects. The privacy rights of human subjects must always be observed.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Examples of potential conflicts of interest which should be disclosed include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. If the editor or the publisher learns from a third party that a published work contains a significant error, it is the obligation of the author to promptly retract or correct the paper or provide evidence to the editor of the correctness of the original paper.”

 

Conflict of Interest

The editors of the Journal Ars Veterinaria belive that to take the best decision on how to handle a submission, they should be alerted to the existence of any conflict of interest. It is not a question of rejecting a paper due to the existence of these conflicts, but, if necessary, to clarify the existence of that conflict.

A potential conflict of interest exists when professional judgment concerning a primary interest (such as the patient’s welfare or the validity of a research) can be influenced by a secondary interest (such as financial gain, issues involving patents or even personal rivalries, among others). A conflict may exist when authors of an article have a financial interest that could influence, even unintentionally, the interpretation of their results or those of others.

We understand that there is nothing inherently unethical in a conflict of interest if it is recognized and declared.

If there is any conflict of interest, it should be listed at the end of the manuscript, before the references.